Why website
accessibility matters
The Information and Communication Standard under the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation states that websites and content will conform to the World Wide Web Consortium Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 at Level A and AA, with the exclusion of live captions and descriptive audio interpretation.
Courts may consider this decision a precedent beyond the federal government. Organizations in Ontario (under the AODA)—and across the country—should think about these factors:
- Alternative
formats to provide important information, with or without aid from a
representative, cannot match equal rights to receive information as
quickly and privately as another person when the information is readily
available to the public
- The
standards are not finished, and they clearly will not make Ontario
accessible by the year 2025 if new standards are not developed and
released soon
- People
with disabilities do not have to wait for the AODA and standards to make
equality rights a reality; that is, they may already challenge an
organization or individual that they believe has discriminated against
them
- This
case affects how information and communications on the Internet are delivered
nationally, and is not limited to the province of Ontario
- Train
staff to produce accessible information and communications now.
- Beat the
goal in the Integrated Accessibility
Regulation and use 15 months as the time to deliver
accessible Internet content.
- Grab the
accessibility Internet consultants that are available because supply is
not as high as demand. If you wait, you may pay more to educate staff and
to make your Internet communications accessible. The earlier everyone
involved produces accessible information and communications, there will be
less to fix later. It costs less to do something right the first time than
to fix a problem.
- Take
note, in the Integrated Accessibility
Regulation, only
the government is obliged to make intranet sites accessible. If your
intranet sites are not accessible you may:
- See
a standard released in the next few years to correct this issue
- Be
taken to court because a person who is blind or has low vision or low
mobility is not provided equal opportunity for employment and advancement
at the workplace
- Focus on
any information vital for the well-being of persons with a disability, or
for providing equal opportunity. An example is your organization’s
capacity to advertise work positions and receive responses in an
accessible manner. If you use an advertising agency to promote your open
job positions, ensure they are taking the steps now to become accessible.
- Focus on
alternative formats that protect privacy and allow users to access
information in a timely manner. In the present case, Jodhan required
outside assistance to obtain information verbally or on paper. Braille is
considered as the appropriate alternative format if she received
information on paper. However, Braille is not the only format because
there are many people who are Blind or have low vision who do not know how
to read Braille. Ask the customer for the preferred method to communicate,
do your best to comply and avoid a reliance on staff to relay information
verbally. Remember, if you provide information and methods to interact
with your organization via the Internet, no alternative format can compete
with these online services.
Finally, if IT accessibility consultants become too expensive to contract, maybe we will have to campaign together for accessible prices!
Take the time to share some of your
thoughts on website accessibility.
If you are interested in learning more about Accessibility for
Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) or how to make accessibility a
natural part of your business through the application of Corporate Social
Responsibility, please contact Sandra Broekhof @ 416-503-1035 or sandra_broekhof@sympatico.ca or visit www.accessibilitycompliance.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment